Which type is defined as intimacy and commitment but no passion?

Which type is defined as intimacy and commitment but no passion?

• A. Nonlove
• B. Companionate love
• C. Infatuation
• D. Romantic love

Answer: (B)

In Sternberg’s framework, love is built from three components: intimacy (closeness and sharing), passion (desire and romance), and commitment (the decision to stay together). When a relationship has intimacy and commitment but lacks strong passion, the pattern is called companionate love. You’ll often see this in long-term partnerships that feel deeply connected, comfortable, and loyal, with a solid future together, but where the initial spark or sexual/romantic excitement isn’t the driving force anymore. Nonlove would mean none of the elements are present, so it wouldn’t feel like a relationship at all. Infatuation is all about passion with little or no intimacy or long-term planning. Romantic love centers on intimacy and passion, and may not hinge on a long-term commitment. So, the combination of closeness and lasting bond without a strong romantic-physical spark best fits companionate love.

In Sternberg’s framework, love is built from three components: intimacy (closeness and sharing), passion (desire and romance), and commitment (the decision to stay together). When a relationship has intimacy and commitment but lacks strong passion, the pattern is called companionate love. You’ll often see this in long-term partnerships that feel deeply connected, comfortable, and loyal, with a solid future together, but where the initial spark or sexual/romantic excitement isn’t the driving force anymore.

Nonlove would mean none of the elements are present, so it wouldn’t feel like a relationship at all. Infatuation is all about passion with little or no intimacy or long-term planning. Romantic love centers on intimacy and passion, and may not hinge on a long-term commitment. So, the combination of closeness and lasting bond without a strong romantic-physical spark best fits companionate love.